bone cell: have in pattern structure

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tissue
Weight: 0.76
, cell
Weight: 0.68
, osteoblast
Weight: 0.68
Siblings osteocyte
Weight: 0.55
, osteoclast
Weight: 0.54
, bone tissue
Weight: 0.42
, muscle cell
Weight: 0.41
, fat cell
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
have in pattern structure 1.00
have in circular pattern structure 0.94
differ in structure 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(bone cell, have in pattern structure)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(muscle cell, differ in structure)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(bone cell, have in pattern structure)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(muscle cell, differ in structure)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(muscle cell, differ in structure)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(bone cell, have in pattern structure)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(bone cell, have in pattern structure)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(bone cell, have in pattern structure)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bone cell, have in circular pattern structure)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(bone cell, have in pattern structure)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(bone cell, differ in structure)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(bone cell, have in pattern structure)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(bone cell, have in circular pattern structure)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(bone cell, have in pattern structure)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(bone cell, have in circular pattern structure)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(bone cell, have in pattern structure)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(bone cell, have in circular pattern structure)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(bone cell, have in pattern structure)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(bone cell, differ in structure)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(bone cell, have in pattern structure)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(bone cell, differ in structure)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(bone cell, have in pattern structure)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(bone cell, differ in structure)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(bone cell, have in pattern structure)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(bone cell, have in pattern structure)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(bone cell, have in pattern structure)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(bone cell, have in pattern structure)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(bone cell, have in pattern structure)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(bone cell, have in pattern structure)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(muscle cell, differ in structure)