bono: is fucking rich

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents celebrity
Weight: 0.62
, rock star
Weight: 0.61
, star
Weight: 0.56
, artist
Weight: 0.56
, musician
Weight: 0.51
Siblings albert einstein
Weight: 0.34
, ozzy osbourne
Weight: 0.34
, stephen hawking
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is fucking rich 1.00
is rich 0.87
be from u2 regarded as shit 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(musician, is rich)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(bono, is fucking rich)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(bono, is fucking rich)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(musician, is rich)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(bono, is fucking rich)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(musician, is rich)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(musician, is rich)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(bono, is fucking rich)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(bono, is fucking rich)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(bono, is fucking rich)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(bono, is fucking rich)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(bono, is fucking rich)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(bono, be from u2 regarded as shit)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(bono, is fucking rich)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(bono, be from u2 regarded as shit)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(bono, is fucking rich)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(bono, be from u2 regarded as shit)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(bono, is fucking rich)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(bono, is rich)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(bono, is fucking rich)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(bono, be from u2 regarded as shit)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(bono, is fucking rich)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(bono, is rich)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(bono, is fucking rich)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(bono, is rich)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(bono, is fucking rich)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(bono, is rich)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(bono, is fucking rich)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(bono, is fucking rich)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(bono, is fucking rich)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(bono, is fucking rich)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(bono, is fucking rich)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(bono, is fucking rich)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(musician, is rich)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(bono, is fucking rich)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(musician, is rich)