bonus: be taxed more than salary

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents prize
Weight: 0.64
, sum
Weight: 0.60
, promotion
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings score
Weight: 0.59
, ending
Weight: 0.45
, award
Weight: 0.33
, purse
Weight: 0.32
, swag
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be taxed more than salary 1.00
is taxed more 0.89
get taxed more 0.89
work in salary cap 0.87
get taxed 0.87
is taxed 0.86
be taxed 0.86
get taxed at 40 0.86
be taxed at 50 0.86
be taxed at 45 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(prize, is taxed)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(bonus, be taxed more than salary)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(prize, is taxed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(prize, is taxed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(prize, is taxed)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(bonus, be taxed more than salary)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(bonus, be taxed more than salary)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(bonus, be taxed at 50)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(bonus, be taxed)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(bonus, be taxed at 45)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(bonus, get taxed at 40)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bonus, get taxed)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(bonus, work in salary cap)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(bonus, get taxed more)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(bonus, is taxed more)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(bonus, is taxed)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(bonus, be taxed)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(bonus, is taxed)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(bonus, be taxed)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(bonus, get taxed)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(bonus, is taxed)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(bonus, get taxed)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(bonus, get taxed)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(bonus, is taxed)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(bonus, be taxed)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(bonus, be taxed at 50)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(bonus, be taxed at 45)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(bonus, work in salary cap)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(bonus, get taxed at 40)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(bonus, get taxed more)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(bonus, be taxed at 50)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(bonus, get taxed more)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(bonus, get taxed more)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(bonus, is taxed more)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(bonus, work in salary cap)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(bonus, is taxed more)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(bonus, is taxed more)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(bonus, be taxed at 45)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(bonus, get taxed at 40)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(bonus, be taxed at 50)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(bonus, be taxed at 45)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(bonus, work in salary cap)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(bonus, get taxed at 40)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bonus, be taxed more than salary)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(bonus, be taxed more than salary)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(prize, is taxed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(bonus, be taxed more than salary)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(prize, is taxed)