book: be better than computer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cookbook
Weight: 0.70
, good book
Weight: 0.69
, read
Weight: 0.63
, artifact
Weight: 0.63
Siblings reading book
Weight: 0.79
, phone book
Weight: 0.78
, blue book
Weight: 0.76
, math book
Weight: 0.74
, autobiography
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than computer 1.00
be better than computers 0.95
be better than playaways 0.86
be better than internet 0.86
be better than movies 0.82
be better than television 0.81
be better than movie 0.81
be better than tv 0.81
be much cheaper than online 0.80
be considered better than movies 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(book, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(reading book, be better than television)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(book, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(reading book, be better than television)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(reading book, be better than television)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(book, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(book, be better than computer)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(book, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(book, be better than computers)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(book, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(book, be better than computers)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(book, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(book, be better than computers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(book, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(book, be better than computers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(book, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(book, be better than movies)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(book, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(book, be better than movies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(book, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(book, be better than movies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(book, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(book, be better than television)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(book, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(book, be better than tv)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(book, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(book, be better than television)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(book, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(book, be better than tv)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(book, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(book, be better than tv)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(book, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(book, be better than movie)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(book, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(book, be better than movie)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(book, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(book, be better than television)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(book, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(book, be better than movie)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(book, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(book, be better than movie)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(book, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(book, be better than movie)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(book, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(book, be better than movie)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(book, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(book, be better than internet)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(book, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(book, be better than movies)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(book, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(book, be better than internet)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(book, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(book, be better than television)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(book, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(book, be better than tv)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(book, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(book, be better than internet)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(book, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(book, be better than movie)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(book, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(book, be better than movie)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(book, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(book, be better than internet)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(book, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(book, be better than playaways)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(book, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(book, be better than playaways)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(book, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(book, be better than playaways)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(book, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(book, be better than playaways)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(book, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(book, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(book, be better than computer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(book, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(book, be better than computer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(book, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(reading book, be better than television)