book: be better than television

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cookbook
Weight: 0.70
, good book
Weight: 0.69
, read
Weight: 0.63
, artifact
Weight: 0.63
Siblings reading book
Weight: 0.79
, phone book
Weight: 0.78
, blue book
Weight: 0.76
, math book
Weight: 0.74
, autobiography
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than television 1.00
be better than tv 0.90
be better than movies 0.84
be better than playaways 0.84
be better than movie 0.83
be better than internet 0.82
be considered better than movies 0.82
be better than computer 0.81
be better than other forms of media 0.80
is better movies 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(book, be better than television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(reading book, be better than television)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(book, be better than television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(reading book, be better than television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(reading book, be better than television)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(book, be better than television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(book, be better than television)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(book, be better than television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(book, be better than tv)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(book, be better than television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(book, be better than tv)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(book, be better than television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(book, be better than tv)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(book, be better than television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(book, be better than movies)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(book, be better than television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(book, be better than movies)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(book, be better than television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(book, be better than movies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(book, be better than television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(book, be better than computer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(book, be better than television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(book, be better than movie)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(book, be better than television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(book, be better than movie)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(book, be better than television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(book, be better than movie)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(book, be better than television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(book, be better than computer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(book, be better than television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(book, be better than movie)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(book, be better than television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(book, be better than movie)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(book, be better than television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(book, be better than movie)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(book, be better than television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(book, be better than computer)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(book, be better than television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(book, be better than tv)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(book, be better than television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(book, be better than movies)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(book, be better than television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(book, be better than computer)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(book, be better than television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(book, be better than internet)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(book, be better than television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(book, be better than internet)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(book, be better than television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(book, be better than movie)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(book, be better than television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(book, be better than movie)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(book, be better than television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(book, be better than internet)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(book, be better than television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(book, be better than internet)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(book, be better than television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(book, be better than playaways)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(book, be better than television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(book, be better than playaways)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(book, be better than television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(book, be better than playaways)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(book, be better than television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(book, be better than playaways)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(book, be better than television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(book, be better than television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(book, be better than television)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(book, be better than television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(book, be better than television)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(book, be better than television) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(reading book, be better than television)