boomerang: has quality effect

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents weapon
Weight: 0.65
, object
Weight: 0.62
, artifact
Weight: 0.59
, channel
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.54
Siblings biological weapon
Weight: 0.33
, projectile
Weight: 0.33
, meteor
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality effect 1.00
has quality good 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(weapon, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(boomerang, has quality effect)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(boomerang, has quality effect)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(weapon, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(boomerang, has quality effect)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(weapon, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(weapon, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(boomerang, has quality effect)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(boomerang, has quality effect)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(boomerang, has quality effect)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(boomerang, has quality effect)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(boomerang, has quality effect)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(boomerang, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(boomerang, has quality effect)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(boomerang, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(boomerang, has quality effect)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(boomerang, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(boomerang, has quality effect)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(boomerang, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(boomerang, has quality effect)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(boomerang, has quality effect)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(boomerang, has quality effect)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(boomerang, has quality effect)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(boomerang, has quality effect)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(boomerang, has quality effect)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(weapon, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(boomerang, has quality effect)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(weapon, has quality good)