boost: has quality service

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents function
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, parameter
Weight: 0.52
, endorsement
Weight: 0.51
Siblings spark
Weight: 0.32
, bump
Weight: 0.31
, dent
Weight: 0.31
, big bang
Weight: 0.31
, hurdle
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality service 1.00
have service 0.93
is service bad 0.89
have bad service 0.89
is service down 0.85
is mobile service 0.84
is mobile service bad 0.83
is mobile service down 0.82
has quality good 0.81
has quality bad 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hurdle, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(spark, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(spark, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(spark, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(hurdle, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(hurdle, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(boost, has quality service)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(boost, have service)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(boost, is service bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(boost, have service)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(boost, is service bad)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(boost, have bad service)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(boost, is service bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(boost, have bad service)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(boost, have bad service)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(boost, is service down)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(boost, is mobile service bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(boost, is mobile service bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(boost, is mobile service bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(boost, is mobile service down)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(boost, is mobile service)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(boost, is service down)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(boost, is mobile service down)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(boost, is mobile service down)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(boost, is service down)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(boost, has quality bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(boost, have service)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(boost, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(boost, is service bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(boost, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(boost, is mobile service bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(boost, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(boost, is service down)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(boost, have bad service)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(boost, is mobile service down)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(boost, is mobile service)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(boost, is mobile service)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(boost, is mobile service)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(boost, have service)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(boost, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(boost, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(boost, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(boost, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(boost, has quality service)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(boost, has quality service)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(spark, has quality good)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(boost, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(hurdle, has quality bad)