boost: is service bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents function
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, parameter
Weight: 0.52
, endorsement
Weight: 0.51
Siblings spark
Weight: 0.32
, bump
Weight: 0.31
, dent
Weight: 0.31
, big bang
Weight: 0.31
, hurdle
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is service bad 1.00
have bad service 0.98
have service 0.92
is mobile service bad 0.91
has quality service 0.89
is service down 0.88
is mobile service 0.84
is mobile service down 0.84
has quality bad 0.78
be mobile for cell phone service 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hurdle, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(hurdle, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(hurdle, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(boost, is service bad)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(boost, have bad service)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(boost, have bad service)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(boost, have bad service)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(boost, have service)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(boost, is mobile service bad)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(boost, is mobile service bad)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(boost, is mobile service bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(boost, is mobile service bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(boost, is mobile service down)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(boost, is mobile service down)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(boost, is service down)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(boost, is mobile service down)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(boost, has quality service)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(boost, have bad service)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(boost, is service down)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(boost, is service down)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(boost, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(boost, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(boost, is mobile service down)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(boost, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(boost, is mobile service)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(boost, be mobile for cell phone service)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(boost, is service down)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(boost, be mobile for cell phone service)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(boost, has quality service)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(boost, be mobile for cell phone service)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(boost, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(boost, is mobile service)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(boost, have service)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(boost, be mobile for cell phone service)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(boost, have service)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(boost, is mobile service)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(boost, has quality service)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(boost, is mobile service)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(boost, has quality service)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(boost, have service)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(boost, is service bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(boost, is service bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(boost, is service bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(hurdle, has quality bad)