booster: is safer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.53
, third party
Weight: 0.49
, group
Weight: 0.47
, part
Weight: 0.46
Siblings rocket launcher
Weight: 0.31
, electric motor
Weight: 0.30
, septic tank
Weight: 0.30
, airbag
Weight: 0.30
, cooling device
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is safer 1.00
be less effective than design-in safety precautions 0.76
be less effective than safety precautions 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(device, be less effective than design-in safety precautions)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(booster, is safer)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(device, be less effective than safety precautions)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(booster, is safer)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(booster, is safer)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(device, be less effective than safety precautions)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(booster, is safer)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(device, be less effective than design-in safety precautions)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(booster, is safer)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(device, be less effective than design-in safety precautions)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(booster, is safer)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(device, be less effective than safety precautions)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(device, be less effective than design-in safety precautions)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(booster, is safer)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(booster, is safer)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(device, be less effective than safety precautions)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(booster, is safer)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(booster, is safer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(booster, is safer)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(booster, is safer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(booster, is safer)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(booster, is safer)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(booster, is safer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(booster, is safer)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(booster, is safer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(booster, is safer)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(device, be less effective than safety precautions)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(booster, is safer)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(device, be less effective than design-in safety precautions)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(booster, is safer)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(device, be less effective than safety precautions)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(booster, is safer)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(device, be less effective than design-in safety precautions)