bootstrap: does have negative margin

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.51
, framework
Weight: 0.47
, programming language
Weight: 0.47
, library
Weight: 0.45
Siblings algorithm
Weight: 0.32
, extraction
Weight: 0.31
, compression
Weight: 0.30
, ligation
Weight: 0.30
, fsck
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
does have negative margin 1.00
does have margin 0.96
use negative margins 0.89
use margins 0.82
have positive impact on individuals with loss 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(method, have positive impact on individuals with loss)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(bootstrap, does have negative margin)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(bootstrap, does have negative margin)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(method, have positive impact on individuals with loss)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(bootstrap, does have negative margin)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(method, have positive impact on individuals with loss)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(method, have positive impact on individuals with loss)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(bootstrap, does have negative margin)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(bootstrap, does have negative margin)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(bootstrap, does have negative margin)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(bootstrap, does have negative margin)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(bootstrap, does have negative margin)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(bootstrap, does have margin)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(bootstrap, does have negative margin)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(bootstrap, does have margin)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(bootstrap, does have negative margin)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(bootstrap, use negative margins)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(bootstrap, does have negative margin)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(bootstrap, use negative margins)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(bootstrap, does have negative margin)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(bootstrap, use negative margins)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(bootstrap, does have negative margin)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(bootstrap, does have margin)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(bootstrap, does have negative margin)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(bootstrap, use margins)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(bootstrap, does have negative margin)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(bootstrap, use margins)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(bootstrap, does have negative margin)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(bootstrap, use negative margins)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(bootstrap, does have negative margin)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(bootstrap, use margins)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(bootstrap, does have negative margin)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(bootstrap, does have margin)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(bootstrap, does have negative margin)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(bootstrap, use margins)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(bootstrap, does have negative margin)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(bootstrap, does have negative margin)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(bootstrap, does have negative margin)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(bootstrap, does have negative margin)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(bootstrap, does have negative margin)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(bootstrap, does have negative margin)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(method, have positive impact on individuals with loss)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(bootstrap, does have negative margin)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(method, have positive impact on individuals with loss)