boredom: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, obstacle
Weight: 0.58
, feeling
Weight: 0.56
, symptom
Weight: 0.55
Siblings loneliness
Weight: 0.35
, laziness
Weight: 0.35
, fatigue
Weight: 0.34
, despair
Weight: 0.34
, exhaustion
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
have problem 0.94
is problem 0.93
has state challenge 0.83
be different from problems 0.82
be research problem 0.82
be most problematic state of being 0.79
has state last 0.78
has state pain 0.77
be problem for teens 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(problem, be research problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(boredom, has state problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(feeling, has state challenge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(boredom, has state problem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(feeling, is problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(boredom, has state problem)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(feeling, have problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(boredom, has state problem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(feeling, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(boredom, has state problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(feeling, have problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(feeling, is problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(feeling, has state pain)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(feeling, has state challenge)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(problem, be research problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(feeling, has state challenge)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(problem, be research problem)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(feeling, has state pain)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(feeling, is problem)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(feeling, have problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(exhaustion, has state last)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(loneliness, be problem for teens)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fatigue, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(laziness, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(feeling, is problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(boredom, has state problem)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(feeling, have problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(boredom, has state problem)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(problem, be research problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(boredom, has state problem)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(feeling, has state challenge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(boredom, has state problem)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(feeling, has state pain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(boredom, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(laziness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(laziness, has state problem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(fatigue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fatigue, has state problem)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(exhaustion, has state last) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(exhaustion, has state last)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(loneliness, be problem for teens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(loneliness, be problem for teens)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(boredom, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(boredom, be most problematic state of being)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(boredom, be most problematic state of being)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(boredom, be most problematic state of being)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(boredom, be most problematic state of being)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(boredom, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(boredom, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(feeling, have problem)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(feeling, is problem)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(feeling, has state pain)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(feeling, has state challenge)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(problem, be research problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(laziness, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fatigue, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(exhaustion, has state last)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(loneliness, be problem for teens)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(feeling, have problem)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(feeling, is problem)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(feeling, has state pain)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(feeling, has state challenge)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(boredom, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(problem, be research problem)