boss: be at office

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.63
, relationship
Weight: 0.59
, title
Weight: 0.57
, time
Weight: 0.57
Siblings manager
Weight: 0.63
, executioner
Weight: 0.40
, captain
Weight: 0.34
, policeman
Weight: 0.34
, old man
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at office 1.00
be at office room 0.90
be at office build 0.88
be work at desk 0.78
be at desk 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(boss, be at office)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at office room)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(boss, be at office)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at desk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(boss, be at office)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(manager, be at desk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(boss, be at office)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(manager, be at office room)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(manager, be at office room)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(boss, be at office)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(manager, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(manager, be at desk)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(boss, be at office)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(manager, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(manager, be at desk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(boss, be at office)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(boss, be at office)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(boss, be at office)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(boss, be at desk)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(boss, be at office)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(boss, be at desk)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(boss, be at office)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(boss, be at desk)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(boss, be at office)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(boss, be at desk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(boss, be at office)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(boss, be at office)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(boss, be at office)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(boss, be at office)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(boss, be at office)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(boss, be at office)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(manager, be at office room)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(boss, be at office)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(manager, be at desk)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(boss, be at office)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(manager, be at desk)