boston: be better than new york

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.64
, north america
Weight: 0.63
, chicago
Weight: 0.62
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.62
, new york city
Weight: 0.61
Siblings latin america
Weight: 0.37
, south america
Weight: 0.36
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.36
, cleveland
Weight: 0.36
, baltimore
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than new york 1.00
hate new york 0.92
be bigger than st louis 0.76
be warmer than america 0.76
be colder than atlanta 0.76
be colder than birmingham uk 0.75
tel aviv flight to new york 0.75
be much poorer than america 0.75
be better than la 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(chicago, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(boston, be better than new york)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(boston, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(chicago, be better than new york)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(boston, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be better than new york)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(boston, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(baltimore, be colder than atlanta)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(boston, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(latin america, be much poorer than america)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(boston, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(south america, be warmer than america)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(chicago, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(boston, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(boston, be better than new york)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(boston, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(south america, be warmer than america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(south america, be warmer than america)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(boston, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(baltimore, be colder than atlanta) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(baltimore, be colder than atlanta)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(boston, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(latin america, be much poorer than america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(latin america, be much poorer than america)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(boston, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(boston, be better than new york)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(boston, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(boston, hate new york)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(boston, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(boston, hate new york)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(boston, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(boston, hate new york)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(boston, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(boston, hate new york)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(boston, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(boston, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(boston, be better than new york)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(boston, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(boston, be better than new york)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(boston, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(chicago, be better than new york)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(boston, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(baltimore, be colder than atlanta)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(boston, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(south america, be warmer than america)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(boston, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(latin america, be much poorer than america)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(boston, be better than new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(chicago, be better than new york)