boston: is awesome

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.64
, north america
Weight: 0.63
, chicago
Weight: 0.62
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.62
, new york city
Weight: 0.61
Siblings latin america
Weight: 0.37
, south america
Weight: 0.36
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.36
, cleveland
Weight: 0.36
, baltimore
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is awesome 1.00
is great 0.83
be made fun 0.76
be made fun of 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(new york, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(boston, is awesome)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(chicago, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(boston, is awesome)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(boston, is awesome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(chicago, is great)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(boston, is awesome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(new york, is great)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(boston, is awesome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(chicago, is great)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(boston, is awesome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(new york, is great)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(boston, is awesome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is great)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(boston, is awesome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, be made fun)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(boston, is awesome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, be made fun of)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(new york, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(boston, is awesome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(boston, is awesome)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(chicago, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(boston, is awesome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(boston, is awesome)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(boston, is awesome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(latin america, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(latin america, is great)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(boston, is awesome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(cleveland, be made fun of) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(cleveland, be made fun of)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(boston, is awesome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(cleveland, be made fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(cleveland, be made fun)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(boston, is awesome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(boston, is awesome)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(boston, is awesome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(boston, is awesome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(boston, is awesome)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(boston, is awesome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(boston, is awesome)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(boston, is awesome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(new york, is great)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(boston, is awesome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(chicago, is great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(boston, is awesome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(cleveland, be made fun of)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(boston, is awesome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(cleveland, be made fun)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(boston, is awesome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(latin america, is great)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(boston, is awesome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(new york, is great)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(boston, is awesome) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(chicago, is great)