botanist: study plant

Related concepts

Parents	scientist Weight: 0.61 , biologist Weight: 0.53 , plant Weight: 0.52 , researcher Weight: 0.51 , expert Weight: 0.48
Siblings	geneticist Weight: 0.36 , geologist Weight: 0.35 , astronomer Weight: 0.35 , archaeologist Weight: 0.35 , physicist Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
study plant	1.00
group plant	0.86
be plant in garden	0.82
study research	0.82
study subject in experiment	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(researcher, study research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(botanist, study plant)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(plant, be plant in garden) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(botanist, study plant)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(researcher, study subject in experiment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(botanist, study plant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(botanist, study plant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(researcher, study subject in experiment)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(botanist, study plant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(plant, be plant in garden)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(botanist, study plant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(researcher, study research)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(botanist, study plant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(researcher, study subject in experiment)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(botanist, study plant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(researcher, study research)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(botanist, study plant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(plant, be plant in garden)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(researcher, study research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(botanist, study plant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(botanist, study plant)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(plant, be plant in garden) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(botanist, study plant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(botanist, study plant)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(researcher, study subject in experiment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(botanist, study plant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(botanist, study plant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.10

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(botanist, study plant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(botanist, study plant)

Similarity expansion

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.29

Typical(botanist, study plant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(botanist, group plant)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(botanist, study plant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(botanist, group plant)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(botanist, study plant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(botanist, group plant)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(botanist, study plant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(botanist, group plant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

Salient(botanist, study plant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(botanist, study plant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(botanist, study plant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(botanist, study plant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(botanist, study plant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(botanist, study plant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(researcher, study research)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(botanist, study plant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(plant, be plant in garden)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(botanist, study plant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(researcher, study subject in experiment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.29

Typical(botanist, study plant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(researcher, study research)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.29

Typical(botanist, study plant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(plant, be plant in garden)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.29

Typical(botanist, study plant) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(researcher, study subject in experiment)