both: be snack

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.61
, record
Weight: 0.51
, thing
Weight: 0.50
, time
Weight: 0.49
, number
Weight: 0.48
Siblings other place
Weight: 0.35
, two
Weight: 0.34
, complex number
Weight: 0.31
, overall
Weight: 0.31
, three
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be snack 1.00
be used to eat to have lunch 0.81
be used to eat to get food 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(place, be used to eat to have lunch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(both, be snack)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(place, be used to eat to get food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(both, be snack)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(both, be snack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(place, be used to eat to have lunch)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(both, be snack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(place, be used to eat to get food)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(both, be snack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(place, be used to eat to have lunch)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(both, be snack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(place, be used to eat to get food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(place, be used to eat to have lunch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(both, be snack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(both, be snack)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(place, be used to eat to get food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(both, be snack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(both, be snack)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(both, be snack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(both, be snack)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(both, be snack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(both, be snack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(both, be snack)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(both, be snack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(both, be snack)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(both, be snack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(place, be used to eat to get food)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(both, be snack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(place, be used to eat to have lunch)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(both, be snack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(place, be used to eat to have lunch)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(both, be snack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(place, be used to eat to get food)