bottled water: is more expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drinking water
Weight: 0.78
, soft drink
Weight: 0.74
, beverage
Weight: 0.74
, bottle
Weight: 0.68
, drinking
Weight: 0.66
Siblings carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.39
, glass bottle
Weight: 0.37
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.37
, wine bottle
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more expensive 1.00
is expensive 0.94
be more expensive than pop 0.88
be more expensive than soda 0.86
be more expensive than tap water 0.84
be more popular than water 0.84
be more expensive than gasoline 0.84
cost more than gas 0.83
cost more than soda 0.81
be more expensive than bottled soda 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(soft drink, is expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(bottled water, is more expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(soft drink, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(glass bottle, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(soft drink, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(bottled water, is more expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(glass bottle, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(glass bottle, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(bottled water, is more expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(bottled water, is expensive)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(bottled water, is expensive)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(bottled water, is expensive)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(bottled water, be more expensive than soda)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(bottled water, be more expensive than soda)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(bottled water, be more expensive than soda)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, be more expensive than soda)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(bottled water, be more expensive than tap water)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(bottled water, be more expensive than tap water)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(bottled water, be more expensive than gasoline)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(bottled water, be more popular than water)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(bottled water, be more popular than water)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(bottled water, be more expensive than gasoline)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(bottled water, be more expensive than gasoline)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(bottled water, cost more than gas)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(bottled water, cost more than gas)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(bottled water, be more expensive than tap water)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(bottled water, be more popular than water)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(bottled water, cost more than soda)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(bottled water, cost more than soda)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(bottled water, cost more than soda)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(bottled water, cost more than gas)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, be more expensive than pop)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, be more expensive than gasoline)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(bottled water, be more expensive than bottled soda)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(bottled water, be more expensive than bottled soda)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(bottled water, be more expensive than bottled soda)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, cost more than soda)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, be more expensive than bottled soda)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, is expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, be more expensive than tap water)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, be more popular than water)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, cost more than gas)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, is more expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(bottled water, is more expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(glass bottle, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(bottled water, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, is expensive)