boundary: be used to identify ownership

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.60
, limit
Weight: 0.59
, change
Weight: 0.57
, characteristic
Weight: 0.55
, object
Weight: 0.54
Siblings fence
Weight: 0.32
, sphere
Weight: 0.31
, partition
Weight: 0.31
, side
Weight: 0.31
, triangle
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to identify ownership 1.00
be used to identify property 0.86
be used to show border of land ownership 0.80
be used to define property 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(boundary, be used to identify ownership)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fence, be used to show border of land ownership)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(boundary, be used to identify ownership)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(fence, be used to define property)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(boundary, be used to identify ownership)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(fence, be used to show border of land ownership)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(fence, be used to show border of land ownership)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(boundary, be used to identify ownership)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(fence, be used to define property)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(fence, be used to define property)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(boundary, be used to identify ownership)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(boundary, be used to identify ownership)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(boundary, be used to identify ownership)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(boundary, be used to identify property)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(boundary, be used to identify ownership)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(boundary, be used to identify property)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(boundary, be used to identify ownership)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(boundary, be used to identify property)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(boundary, be used to identify ownership)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(boundary, be used to identify property)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(boundary, be used to identify ownership)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(boundary, be used to identify ownership)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(boundary, be used to identify ownership)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(boundary, be used to identify ownership)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(boundary, be used to identify ownership)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(boundary, be used to identify ownership)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(fence, be used to define property)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(boundary, be used to identify ownership)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(fence, be used to show border of land ownership)