boundary: be used to mark one territory

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.60
, limit
Weight: 0.59
, change
Weight: 0.57
, characteristic
Weight: 0.55
, object
Weight: 0.54
Siblings fence
Weight: 0.32
, sphere
Weight: 0.31
, partition
Weight: 0.31
, side
Weight: 0.31
, triangle
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to mark one territory 1.00
be used to mark territory 0.99
be used to mark property line 0.82
be used to mark boundary 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(boundary, be used to mark one territory)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fence, be used to mark property line)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(boundary, be used to mark one territory)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(fence, be used to mark property line)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fence, be used to mark property line)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(boundary, be used to mark one territory)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(boundary, be used to mark one territory)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(boundary, be used to mark one territory)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(boundary, be used to mark territory)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(boundary, be used to mark one territory)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(boundary, be used to mark territory)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(boundary, be used to mark one territory)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(boundary, be used to mark territory)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(boundary, be used to mark one territory)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(boundary, be used to mark territory)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(boundary, be used to mark one territory)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(boundary, be used to mark one territory)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(boundary, be used to mark one territory)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(boundary, be used to mark one territory)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(boundary, be used to mark one territory)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(boundary, be used to mark one territory)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fence, be used to mark property line)