bow: were popular

Related concepts

Parents	tool Weight: 0.59 , weapon Weight: 0.58 , gesture Weight: 0.57 , detail Weight: 0.56
Siblings	submachine gun Weight: 0.33 , rifle Weight: 0.32 , sword Weight: 0.32 , spear Weight: 0.32 , fishing rod Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
were popular	1.00
is popular	0.91
were important to hunters-gatherers	0.83
were devoloped	0.81
were helpful to early people	0.77
were helpful to people	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(tool, were important to hunters-gatherers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(bow, were popular)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(bow, were popular)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(bow, were popular)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(weapon, were devoloped) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(bow, were popular)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(bow, were popular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(weapon, were devoloped)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(bow, were popular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(tool, were important to hunters-gatherers)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(bow, were popular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(tool, were helpful to people)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(bow, were popular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(bow, were popular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(weapon, were devoloped)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(bow, were popular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to early people)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(bow, were popular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(tool, were important to hunters-gatherers)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(bow, were popular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to people)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(bow, were popular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(sword, is popular)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(tool, were important to hunters-gatherers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(bow, were popular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(bow, were popular)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(bow, were popular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(bow, were popular)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(weapon, were devoloped) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(bow, were popular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(bow, were popular)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(bow, were popular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(bow, were popular)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(bow, were popular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(sword, is popular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(sword, is popular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(bow, were popular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(bow, were popular)

Similarity expansion

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(bow, were popular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(bow, is popular)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(bow, were popular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(bow, is popular)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(bow, were popular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(bow, is popular)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(bow, were popular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(bow, is popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(bow, were popular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(bow, were popular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(bow, were popular)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(bow, were popular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(bow, were popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(bow, were popular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(weapon, were devoloped)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(bow, were popular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to people)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(bow, were popular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to early people)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(bow, were popular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(tool, were important to hunters-gatherers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(bow, were popular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(sword, is popular)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(bow, were popular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(weapon, were devoloped)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(bow, were popular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(tool, were important to hunters-gatherers)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(bow, were popular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to people)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(bow, were popular) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to early people)