bowl: has quality price

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents form
Weight: 0.62
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.59
, event
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.56
Siblings toilet bowl
Weight: 0.60
, cup
Weight: 0.59
, wooden spoon
Weight: 0.34
, frying pan
Weight: 0.32
, ladle
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality price 1.00
have prices 0.86
have prices for color 0.85
have prices at first 0.84
drop bad in price 0.84
have different prices 0.84
have different prices for color 0.83
have prices for different color 0.83
has quality good 0.80
is price tanking today 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bowl, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cup, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bowl, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cup, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(cup, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bowl, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(bowl, has quality price)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(bowl, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(bowl, is price tanking today)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bowl, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(bowl, is price tanking today)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(bowl, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(bowl, is price tanking today)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(bowl, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(bowl, is price tanking today)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(bowl, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(bowl, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(bowl, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(bowl, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(bowl, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bowl, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bowl, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(bowl, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(bowl, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(bowl, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bowl, has quality price)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bowl, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(bowl, has quality price)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bowl, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cup, has quality good)