boxer: be considered working dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fighter
Weight: 0.69
, athlete
Weight: 0.69
, dog
Weight: 0.64
, character
Weight: 0.63
, breed
Weight: 0.62
Siblings wrestler
Weight: 0.38
, gymnast
Weight: 0.36
, cyclist
Weight: 0.35
, beagle
Weight: 0.35
, tennis player
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered working dogs 1.00
be considered dogs 0.92
is good dogs 0.87
have dogs 0.86
is dogs 0.86
is best dogs 0.84
is dangerous dogs 0.84
have expensive dogs 0.83
is good family dogs 0.83
is family dogs 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(boxer, be considered working dogs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.00
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(boxer, be considered working dogs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, is dogs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(boxer, be considered working dogs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, is dogs)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(boxer, be considered working dogs)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is good dogs)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(boxer, be considered working dogs)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is dogs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(boxer, be considered working dogs)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(boxer, be considered working dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(boxer, be considered working dogs)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(beagle, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(beagle, is dogs)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(boxer, be considered working dogs)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(beagle, is good dogs)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(beagle, is good dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(boxer, be considered working dogs)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(boxer, be considered working dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(boxer, be considered working dogs)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(boxer, be considered dogs)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(boxer, be considered working dogs)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(boxer, be considered dogs)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(boxer, be considered working dogs)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(boxer, be considered dogs)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(boxer, be considered working dogs)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(boxer, is dogs)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(boxer, be considered working dogs)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(boxer, is dogs)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(boxer, be considered working dogs)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(boxer, is dogs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(boxer, be considered working dogs)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(boxer, be considered dogs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(boxer, be considered working dogs)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(boxer, is dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(boxer, be considered working dogs)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(boxer, be considered working dogs)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(boxer, be considered working dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(boxer, be considered working dogs)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(boxer, be considered working dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(boxer, be considered working dogs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(boxer, be considered working dogs)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(beagle, is dogs)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(boxer, be considered working dogs)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(beagle, is good dogs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(boxer, be considered working dogs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)