boy: be bad at tennis

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents young man
Weight: 0.70
, girl
Weight: 0.69
, child
Weight: 0.66
, man
Weight: 0.66
Siblings boy scout
Weight: 0.75
, baby
Weight: 0.64
, boyfriend
Weight: 0.62
, jack
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad at tennis 1.00
play basketball 0.82
be into soccer 0.79
play baseball 0.77
wear basketball shorts to school 0.77
be worse at sports 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(boy, be bad at tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(boy, be bad at tennis)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(boy, be bad at tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(boy, play basketball)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(boy, be bad at tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(boy, wear basketball shorts to school)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(boy, be bad at tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(boy, be worse at sports)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(boy, be bad at tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(boy, play basketball)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(boy, be bad at tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(boy, wear basketball shorts to school)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(boy, be bad at tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(boy, be worse at sports)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(boy, be bad at tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(boy, play basketball)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(boy, be bad at tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(boy, wear basketball shorts to school)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(boy, be bad at tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(boy, play basketball)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(boy, be bad at tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(boy, wear basketball shorts to school)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(boy, be bad at tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(boy, be worse at sports)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(boy, be bad at tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(boy, be worse at sports)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(boy, be bad at tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(boy, be bad at tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(boy, be bad at tennis)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(boy, be bad at tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(boy, be bad at tennis)