boycott: be effective form of protest

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents action
Weight: 0.59
, method
Weight: 0.56
, movement
Weight: 0.56
, activity
Weight: 0.54
, decision
Weight: 0.52
Siblings strike
Weight: 0.33
, ban
Weight: 0.32
, injunction
Weight: 0.32
, lawsuit
Weight: 0.31
, recall
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be effective form of protest 1.00
were effective way protesting 0.90
be good way to protest 0.88
be successful method of protest 0.87
were used protest 0.86
is effective 0.80
were effective 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(method, is effective)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(boycott, be effective form of protest)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(boycott, be effective form of protest)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(method, is effective)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(boycott, be effective form of protest)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(method, is effective)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(method, is effective)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(boycott, be effective form of protest)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(boycott, be effective form of protest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(boycott, be effective form of protest)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(boycott, be effective form of protest)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(boycott, be effective form of protest)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(boycott, were used protest)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(boycott, be effective form of protest)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(boycott, be good way to protest)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(boycott, be effective form of protest)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(boycott, were used protest)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(boycott, be effective form of protest)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(boycott, were effective way protesting)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(boycott, be effective form of protest)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(boycott, be good way to protest)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(boycott, be effective form of protest)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(boycott, be good way to protest)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(boycott, be effective form of protest)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(boycott, be successful method of protest)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(boycott, be effective form of protest)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(boycott, be successful method of protest)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(boycott, be effective form of protest)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(boycott, be successful method of protest)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(boycott, be effective form of protest)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(boycott, be good way to protest)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(boycott, be effective form of protest)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(boycott, were effective way protesting)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(boycott, be effective form of protest)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(boycott, be successful method of protest)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(boycott, be effective form of protest)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(boycott, were used protest)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(boycott, be effective form of protest)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(boycott, is effective)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(boycott, be effective form of protest)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(boycott, were effective)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(boycott, be effective form of protest)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(boycott, is effective)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(boycott, be effective form of protest)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(boycott, is effective)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(boycott, be effective form of protest)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(boycott, were effective)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(boycott, be effective form of protest)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(boycott, were effective way protesting)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(boycott, be effective form of protest)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(boycott, were effective)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(boycott, be effective form of protest)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(boycott, is effective)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(boycott, be effective form of protest)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(boycott, were effective way protesting)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(boycott, be effective form of protest)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(boycott, were effective)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(boycott, be effective form of protest)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(boycott, were used protest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(boycott, be effective form of protest)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(boycott, be effective form of protest)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(boycott, be effective form of protest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(boycott, be effective form of protest)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(boycott, be effective form of protest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(boycott, be effective form of protest)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(method, is effective)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(boycott, be effective form of protest)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(method, is effective)