boycott: be ineffective in current system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents action
Weight: 0.59
, method
Weight: 0.56
, movement
Weight: 0.56
, activity
Weight: 0.54
, decision
Weight: 0.52
Siblings strike
Weight: 0.33
, ban
Weight: 0.32
, injunction
Weight: 0.32
, lawsuit
Weight: 0.31
, recall
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be ineffective in current system 1.00
be ineffective in system 0.97
is effective 0.76
were effective 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(method, is effective)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(boycott, be ineffective in current system)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(boycott, be ineffective in current system)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(method, is effective)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(boycott, be ineffective in current system)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(method, is effective)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(method, is effective)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(boycott, be ineffective in current system)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(boycott, be ineffective in current system)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(boycott, be ineffective in current system)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(boycott, be ineffective in current system)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(boycott, be ineffective in current system)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(boycott, be ineffective in system)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(boycott, be ineffective in current system)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(boycott, be ineffective in system)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(boycott, be ineffective in current system)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(boycott, be ineffective in system)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(boycott, be ineffective in current system)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(boycott, be ineffective in system)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(boycott, be ineffective in current system)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(boycott, is effective)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(boycott, be ineffective in current system)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(boycott, were effective)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(boycott, be ineffective in current system)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(boycott, is effective)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(boycott, be ineffective in current system)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(boycott, is effective)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(boycott, be ineffective in current system)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(boycott, were effective)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(boycott, be ineffective in current system)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(boycott, is effective)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(boycott, be ineffective in current system)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(boycott, were effective)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(boycott, be ineffective in current system)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(boycott, were effective)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(boycott, be ineffective in current system)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(boycott, be ineffective in current system)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(boycott, be ineffective in current system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(boycott, be ineffective in current system)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(boycott, be ineffective in current system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(boycott, be ineffective in current system)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(method, is effective)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(boycott, be ineffective in current system)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(method, is effective)