boycott: were effective

Property	Similarity
were effective	1.00
is effective	0.94
were effective solution to problem	0.84
were effective way protesting	0.80
be effective form of protest	0.80
were effective solution to problem of taxes	0.79
be ineffective in system	0.76
be ineffective in current system	0.75

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(boycott, were effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(boycott, were effective solution to problem)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(boycott, were effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Salient(boycott, were effective solution to problem)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(boycott, were effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Plausible(boycott, were effective solution to problem of taxes)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(boycott, were effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(boycott, were effective solution to problem)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(boycott, were effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Plausible(boycott, be ineffective in system)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(boycott, were effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Salient(boycott, were effective solution to problem of taxes)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(boycott, were effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(boycott, were effective solution to problem of taxes)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(boycott, were effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Salient(boycott, be ineffective in system)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(boycott, were effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(boycott, is effective)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(boycott, were effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(boycott, were effective solution to problem)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(boycott, were effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(boycott, be ineffective in system)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(boycott, were effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Salient(boycott, is effective)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(boycott, were effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Plausible(boycott, be ineffective in current system)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(boycott, were effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Salient(boycott, be ineffective in current system)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(boycott, were effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(boycott, is effective)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(boycott, were effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(boycott, be ineffective in current system)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(boycott, were effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(boycott, be ineffective in system)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(boycott, were effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(boycott, be ineffective in current system)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(boycott, were effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Salient(boycott, be effective form of protest)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(boycott, were effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(boycott, were effective solution to problem of taxes)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(boycott, were effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(boycott, is effective)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(boycott, were effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(boycott, be effective form of protest)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(boycott, were effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(boycott, were effective way protesting)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(boycott, were effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(boycott, be effective form of protest)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(boycott, were effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(boycott, be effective form of protest)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(boycott, were effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(boycott, were effective way protesting)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(boycott, were effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Salient(boycott, were effective way protesting)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(boycott, were effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(boycott, were effective way protesting)

Parents	action Weight: 0.59 , method Weight: 0.56 , movement Weight: 0.56 , activity Weight: 0.54 , decision Weight: 0.52
Siblings	strike Weight: 0.33 , ban Weight: 0.32 , injunction Weight: 0.32 , lawsuit Weight: 0.31 , recall Weight: 0.31

boycott: were effective

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

Remarkability from parent implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

Typicality inheritance from parent to child