bp: be blamed for oil spill

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents oil company
Weight: 0.62
, oil
Weight: 0.61
, product
Weight: 0.58
, operator
Weight: 0.57
, client
Weight: 0.56
Siblings castor oil
Weight: 0.32
, baby oil
Weight: 0.32
, motor oil
Weight: 0.32
, oil well
Weight: 0.31
, oil change
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be blamed for oil spill 1.00
be in charge of spill site 0.84
is is sued years after oil disaster 0.79
use toxic corexit oil dispersant 0.76
use highly toxic corexit oil dispersant 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(bp, be blamed for oil spill)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(bp, be blamed for oil spill)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(bp, be blamed for oil spill)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(bp, use toxic corexit oil dispersant)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(bp, be blamed for oil spill)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(bp, use toxic corexit oil dispersant)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(bp, be blamed for oil spill)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(bp, be in charge of spill site)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(bp, be blamed for oil spill)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(bp, use toxic corexit oil dispersant)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(bp, be blamed for oil spill)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(bp, use highly toxic corexit oil dispersant)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(bp, be blamed for oil spill)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(bp, use toxic corexit oil dispersant)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(bp, be blamed for oil spill)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(bp, use highly toxic corexit oil dispersant)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(bp, be blamed for oil spill)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(bp, use highly toxic corexit oil dispersant)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(bp, be blamed for oil spill)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(bp, is is sued years after oil disaster)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(bp, be blamed for oil spill)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(bp, is is sued years after oil disaster)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(bp, be blamed for oil spill)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(bp, is is sued years after oil disaster)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(bp, be blamed for oil spill)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(bp, use highly toxic corexit oil dispersant)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(bp, be blamed for oil spill)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(bp, is is sued years after oil disaster)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(bp, be blamed for oil spill)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(bp, be in charge of spill site)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(bp, be blamed for oil spill)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(bp, be in charge of spill site)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(bp, be blamed for oil spill)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bp, be in charge of spill site)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(bp, be blamed for oil spill)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(bp, be blamed for oil spill)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(bp, be blamed for oil spill)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(bp, be blamed for oil spill)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(bp, be blamed for oil spill)