bpd: has quality questions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.49
, personality disorder
Weight: 0.48
, mental disorder
Weight: 0.47
, mental illness
Weight: 0.47
, condition
Weight: 0.42
Siblings oil change
Weight: 0.31
, gas pedal
Weight: 0.29
, refined sugar
Weight: 0.29
, drill bit
Weight: 0.29
, gallon
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality questions 1.00
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(personality disorder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(bpd, has quality questions)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(bpd, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(personality disorder, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bpd, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(personality disorder, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bpd, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(refined sugar, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bpd, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(gas pedal, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bpd, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(drill bit, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(personality disorder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(bpd, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(bpd, has quality questions)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(bpd, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(refined sugar, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(refined sugar, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(bpd, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(drill bit, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(drill bit, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(bpd, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(gas pedal, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(gas pedal, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(bpd, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(bpd, has quality questions)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(bpd, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(bpd, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(bpd, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(bpd, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(bpd, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(bpd, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(bpd, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(bpd, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(bpd, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(bpd, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bpd, has quality questions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(bpd, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(bpd, has quality questions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bpd, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(personality disorder, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bpd, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(refined sugar, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bpd, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(gas pedal, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bpd, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(drill bit, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(bpd, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(personality disorder, has quality bad)