brain: be better than computer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents neural network
Weight: 0.67
, body part
Weight: 0.67
, computer
Weight: 0.64
, tissue
Weight: 0.62
, nervous system
Weight: 0.61
Siblings pineal gland
Weight: 0.59
, thalamus
Weight: 0.48
, human brain
Weight: 0.39
, blood brain barrier
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than computer 1.00
be like computer 0.90
be called computer 0.86
be called human computer 0.82
be more better than beauty 0.77
is more organised 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(brain, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(human brain, be like computer)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(brain, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(human brain, be better than computer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(brain, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(human brain, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(human brain, be better than computer)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(brain, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(human brain, be like computer)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(human brain, be like computer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(brain, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(brain, be better than computer)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(brain, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(brain, be called computer)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(brain, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(brain, be like computer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(brain, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(brain, be like computer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(brain, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(brain, be called human computer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(brain, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(brain, be called computer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(brain, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(brain, be like computer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(brain, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(brain, be called computer)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(brain, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(brain, be like computer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(brain, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(brain, be called computer)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(brain, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(brain, be called human computer)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(brain, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(brain, be called human computer)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(brain, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(brain, is more organised)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(brain, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(brain, be more better than beauty)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(brain, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(brain, be more better than beauty)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(brain, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(brain, is more organised)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(brain, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(brain, be called human computer)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(brain, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(brain, be more better than beauty)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(brain, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(brain, is more organised)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(brain, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(brain, be more better than beauty)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(brain, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(brain, is more organised)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(brain, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(brain, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(brain, be better than computer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(brain, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(brain, be better than computer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(brain, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(human brain, be better than computer)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(brain, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(human brain, be like computer)