brain: be called human computer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents neural network
Weight: 0.67
, body part
Weight: 0.67
, computer
Weight: 0.64
, tissue
Weight: 0.62
, nervous system
Weight: 0.61
Siblings pineal gland
Weight: 0.59
, thalamus
Weight: 0.48
, human brain
Weight: 0.39
, blood brain barrier
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called human computer 1.00
be called computer 0.92
be like computer 0.89
be better than computer 0.82
communicate with human body 0.79
be different from animal brains 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(brain, be called human computer)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(human brain, be like computer)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(brain, be called human computer)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(human brain, be different from animal brains)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(brain, be called human computer)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(human brain, be better than computer)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(brain, be called human computer)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(human brain, communicate with human body)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(brain, be called human computer)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(human brain, communicate with human body)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(human brain, communicate with human body)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(brain, be called human computer)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(human brain, be better than computer)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(human brain, be better than computer)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(brain, be called human computer)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(human brain, be different from animal brains)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(human brain, be different from animal brains)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(brain, be called human computer)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(human brain, be like computer)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(human brain, be like computer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(brain, be called human computer)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(brain, be called human computer)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(brain, be called human computer)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(brain, be called computer)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(brain, be called human computer)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(brain, be like computer)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(brain, be called human computer)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(brain, be called computer)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(brain, be called human computer)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(brain, be called computer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(brain, be called human computer)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(brain, communicate with human body)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(brain, be called human computer)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(brain, be like computer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(brain, be called human computer)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(brain, be better than computer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(brain, be called human computer)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(brain, be like computer)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(brain, be called human computer)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(brain, be called computer)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(brain, be called human computer)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(brain, be different from animal brains)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(brain, be called human computer)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(brain, communicate with human body)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(brain, be called human computer)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(brain, be better than computer)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(brain, be called human computer)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(brain, be different from animal brains)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(brain, be called human computer)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(brain, communicate with human body)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(brain, be called human computer)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(brain, be different from animal brains)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(brain, be called human computer)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(brain, be like computer)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(brain, be called human computer)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(brain, be better than computer)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(brain, be called human computer)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(brain, be different from animal brains)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(brain, be called human computer)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(brain, communicate with human body)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(brain, be called human computer)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(brain, be better than computer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(brain, be called human computer)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(brain, be called human computer)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(brain, be called human computer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(brain, be called human computer)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(brain, be called human computer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(brain, be called human computer)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(human brain, communicate with human body)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(brain, be called human computer)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(human brain, be different from animal brains)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(brain, be called human computer)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(human brain, be better than computer)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(brain, be called human computer)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(human brain, be like computer)