brain: be more complex than animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents neural network
Weight: 0.67
, body part
Weight: 0.67
, computer
Weight: 0.64
, tissue
Weight: 0.62
, nervous system
Weight: 0.61
Siblings pineal gland
Weight: 0.59
, thalamus
Weight: 0.48
, human brain
Weight: 0.39
, blood brain barrier
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more complex than animals 1.00
be different from animals 0.84
has state complex 0.83
is more organised 0.80
be different from animal brains 0.76
be more better than beauty 0.76
be smaller than male ones 0.75
be more important than beauty 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(human brain, be different from animals)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(human brain, has state complex)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(human brain, be different from animal brains)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(human brain, be more complex than animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(human brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(human brain, be more complex than animals)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(human brain, be different from animals)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(human brain, be different from animals)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(human brain, be different from animal brains)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(human brain, be different from animal brains)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(human brain, has state complex)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(human brain, has state complex)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(brain, be more complex than animals)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(brain, be different from animals)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(brain, has state complex)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(brain, is more organised)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(brain, be more better than beauty)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(brain, be smaller than male ones)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(brain, be different from animal brains)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(brain, be more important than beauty)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(brain, be different from animal brains)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(brain, be different from animals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(brain, be different from animals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(brain, be different from animals)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(brain, be different from animal brains)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(brain, be different from animal brains)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(brain, has state complex)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(brain, is more organised)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(brain, be more important than beauty)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(brain, be more better than beauty)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(brain, is more organised)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(brain, be smaller than male ones)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(brain, be more important than beauty)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(brain, be more important than beauty)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(brain, is more organised)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(brain, be more better than beauty)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(brain, has state complex)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(brain, be smaller than male ones)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(brain, be more better than beauty)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(brain, has state complex)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(brain, be smaller than male ones)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(brain, be more complex than animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(brain, be more complex than animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(human brain, be more complex than animals)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(human brain, be different from animals)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(human brain, be different from animal brains)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(brain, be more complex than animals)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(human brain, has state complex)