branch: is more powerful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents institution
Weight: 0.67
, office
Weight: 0.66
, channel
Weight: 0.59
, property
Weight: 0.59
, person
Weight: 0.59
Siblings office building
Weight: 0.36
, post office
Weight: 0.35
, home office
Weight: 0.35
, doctor office
Weight: 0.34
, dental office
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more powerful 1.00
is powerful 0.96
is most powerful 0.95
have most power 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(branch, is more powerful)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(branch, is more powerful)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(branch, is more powerful)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(branch, is powerful)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(branch, is more powerful)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(branch, is most powerful)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(branch, is more powerful)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(branch, is most powerful)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(branch, is more powerful)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(branch, is powerful)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(branch, is more powerful)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(branch, is most powerful)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(branch, is more powerful)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(branch, is powerful)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(branch, is more powerful)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(branch, have most power)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(branch, is more powerful)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(branch, is powerful)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(branch, is more powerful)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(branch, is most powerful)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(branch, is more powerful)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(branch, have most power)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(branch, is more powerful)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(branch, have most power)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(branch, is more powerful)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(branch, have most power)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(branch, is more powerful)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(branch, is more powerful)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(branch, is more powerful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(branch, is more powerful)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(branch, is more powerful)