brand: be important to business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents name
Weight: 0.68
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.62
, symbol
Weight: 0.62
Siblings label
Weight: 0.70
, premium
Weight: 0.68
, hermes
Weight: 0.67
, chevrolet
Weight: 0.66
, pepsi
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to business 1.00
be important to success of business 0.88
be important to organisation 0.82
be important to companies 0.82
be important in marketing 0.80
be important to customers 0.77
be important to consumer 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(brand, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(brand, be important to business)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(brand, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(brand, be important to success of business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(brand, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(brand, be important to success of business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(brand, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(brand, be important to organisation)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(brand, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(brand, be important to companies)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(brand, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(brand, be important in marketing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(brand, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(brand, be important to companies)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(brand, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(brand, be important to customers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(brand, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(brand, be important to success of business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(brand, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(brand, be important to companies)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(brand, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(brand, be important to organisation)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(brand, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(brand, be important to organisation)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(brand, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(brand, be important to consumer)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(brand, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(brand, be important to organisation)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(brand, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(brand, be important to success of business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(brand, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(brand, be important in marketing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(brand, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(brand, be important to companies)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(brand, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(brand, be important to consumer)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(brand, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(brand, be important to customers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(brand, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(brand, be important to customers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(brand, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(brand, be important to consumer)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(brand, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(brand, be important in marketing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(brand, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(brand, be important to customers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(brand, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(brand, be important to consumer)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(brand, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(brand, be important in marketing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(brand, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(brand, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(brand, be important to business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(brand, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(brand, be important to business)