brand: be important to consumer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents name
Weight: 0.68
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.62
, symbol
Weight: 0.62
Siblings label
Weight: 0.70
, premium
Weight: 0.68
, hermes
Weight: 0.67
, chevrolet
Weight: 0.66
, pepsi
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to consumer 1.00
matter to consumers 0.85
be important to business 0.76
be important to customers 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(brand, be important to consumer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(brand, be important to consumer)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(brand, be important to consumer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(brand, matter to consumers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(brand, be important to consumer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(brand, matter to consumers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(brand, be important to consumer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(brand, be important to business)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(brand, be important to consumer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(brand, be important to customers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(brand, be important to consumer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(brand, matter to consumers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(brand, be important to consumer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(brand, be important to business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(brand, be important to consumer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(brand, be important to customers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(brand, be important to consumer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(brand, matter to consumers)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(brand, be important to consumer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(brand, be important to customers)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(brand, be important to consumer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(brand, be important to business)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(brand, be important to consumer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(brand, be important to customers)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(brand, be important to consumer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(brand, be important to business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(brand, be important to consumer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(brand, be important to consumer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(brand, be important to consumer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(brand, be important to consumer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(brand, be important to consumer)