brand: have logos

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents name
Weight: 0.68
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.62
, symbol
Weight: 0.62
Siblings label
Weight: 0.70
, premium
Weight: 0.68
, hermes
Weight: 0.67
, chevrolet
Weight: 0.66
, pepsi
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
have logos 1.00
use logos 0.99
need logos 0.98
create logos 0.96
update logos 0.91
change logo 0.88
be more than logo 0.87
spend millions on logo 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(brand, have logos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(brand, have logos)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(brand, have logos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(brand, use logos)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(brand, have logos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(brand, use logos)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(brand, have logos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(brand, need logos)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(brand, have logos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(brand, create logos)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(brand, have logos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(brand, need logos)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(brand, have logos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(brand, update logos)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(brand, have logos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(brand, change logo)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(brand, have logos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(brand, be more than logo)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(brand, have logos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(brand, use logos)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(brand, have logos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(brand, use logos)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(brand, have logos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(brand, spend millions on logo)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(brand, have logos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(brand, change logo)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(brand, have logos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(brand, need logos)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(brand, have logos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(brand, need logos)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(brand, have logos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(brand, create logos)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(brand, have logos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(brand, change logo)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(brand, have logos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(brand, change logo)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(brand, have logos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(brand, update logos)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(brand, have logos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(brand, create logos)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(brand, have logos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(brand, create logos)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(brand, have logos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(brand, update logos)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(brand, have logos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(brand, be more than logo)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(brand, have logos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(brand, update logos)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(brand, have logos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(brand, spend millions on logo)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(brand, have logos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(brand, be more than logo)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(brand, have logos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(brand, be more than logo)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(brand, have logos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(brand, spend millions on logo)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(brand, have logos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(brand, spend millions on logo)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(brand, have logos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(brand, have logos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(brand, have logos)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(brand, have logos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(brand, have logos)