brand: need advertise

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents name
Weight: 0.68
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.62
, symbol
Weight: 0.62
Siblings label
Weight: 0.70
, premium
Weight: 0.68
, hermes
Weight: 0.67
, chevrolet
Weight: 0.66
, pepsi
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
need advertise 1.00
advertise 0.98
need promote 0.80
use advertising 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(brand, need advertise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, advertise)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(brand, need advertise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(pepsi, advertise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(pepsi, advertise)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(brand, need advertise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(brand, need advertise)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(brand, need advertise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(brand, advertise)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(brand, need advertise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(brand, advertise)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(brand, need advertise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(brand, advertise)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(brand, need advertise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(brand, use advertising)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(brand, need advertise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(brand, advertise)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(brand, need advertise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(brand, use advertising)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(brand, need advertise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(brand, need promote)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(brand, need advertise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(brand, use advertising)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(brand, need advertise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(brand, use advertising)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(brand, need advertise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(brand, need promote)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(brand, need advertise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(brand, need promote)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(brand, need advertise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(brand, need promote)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(brand, need advertise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(brand, need advertise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(brand, need advertise)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(brand, need advertise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(brand, need advertise)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(brand, need advertise) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(pepsi, advertise)