brandy: be served warm

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drink
Weight: 0.65
, whiskey
Weight: 0.64
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.61
, beverage
Weight: 0.59
, flavor
Weight: 0.59
Siblings rum
Weight: 0.38
, vodka
Weight: 0.37
, lager
Weight: 0.37
, bourbon
Weight: 0.37
, cider
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be served warm 1.00
be served 0.90
be served on hot days 0.88
be best served ice cold 0.87
be served on days 0.86
be served over ice 0.85
is warm 0.85
get warm 0.84
go warm 0.83
feel warm 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(drink, get warm)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(brandy, be served warm)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(whiskey, feel warm)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(brandy, be served warm)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(brandy, be served warm)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(drink, get warm)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(brandy, be served warm)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(whiskey, feel warm)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(brandy, be served warm)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, feel warm)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(brandy, be served warm)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(drink, get warm)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(brandy, be served warm)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(cider, be served over ice)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(drink, get warm)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(brandy, be served warm)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(brandy, be served warm)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(whiskey, feel warm)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(brandy, be served warm)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(brandy, be served warm)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(brandy, be served warm)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(cider, be served over ice)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(cider, be served over ice)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(brandy, be served warm)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(brandy, be served warm)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(brandy, be served warm)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(brandy, be served)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(brandy, be served warm)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(brandy, be served)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(brandy, be served warm)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(brandy, be served)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(brandy, be served warm)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(brandy, be served)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(brandy, be served warm)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(brandy, is warm)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(brandy, be served warm)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(brandy, is warm)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(brandy, be served warm)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(brandy, is warm)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(brandy, be served warm)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(brandy, is warm)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(brandy, be served warm)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(brandy, be served warm)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(brandy, be served warm)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(brandy, be served warm)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(brandy, be served warm)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(brandy, be served warm)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(drink, get warm)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(brandy, be served warm)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(whiskey, feel warm)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(brandy, be served warm)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(cider, be served over ice)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(brandy, be served warm)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(drink, get warm)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(brandy, be served warm)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(whiskey, feel warm)