brass: be good conductor of heat

Related concepts

Parents	alloy Weight: 0.63 , metal Weight: 0.60 , finish Weight: 0.59 , material Weight: 0.58
Siblings	french horn Weight: 0.60 , heavy metal Weight: 0.33 , aluminum foil Weight: 0.32 , titanium Weight: 0.32 , steel Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be good conductor of heat	1.00
is good heat conductor	1.00
is good conductor	0.92
be good conductor of electricity	0.90
be best conductor of electricity	0.89
be used in heat conductions	0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(metal, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(brass, be good conductor of heat)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(metal, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(brass, be good conductor of heat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(brass, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(metal, be good conductor of electricity)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(brass, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(metal, be good conductor of heat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(brass, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Remarkable(metal, be good conductor of heat)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(brass, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(metal, be good conductor of electricity)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(brass, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, be good conductor of heat)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(brass, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, be good conductor of electricity)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(brass, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good conductor)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(metal, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(brass, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(brass, be good conductor of heat)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(metal, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(brass, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(brass, be good conductor of heat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(brass, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(aluminum foil, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, be good conductor of heat)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(brass, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

Remarkable(aluminum foil, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, be good conductor of electricity)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(brass, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good conductor) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is good conductor)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(brass, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Salient(brass, be good conductor of heat)

Similarity expansion

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(brass, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(brass, is good heat conductor)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

Salient(brass, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Salient(brass, is good heat conductor)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(brass, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(brass, be good conductor of electricity)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.40

Salient(brass, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Salient(brass, be good conductor of electricity)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(brass, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(brass, is good heat conductor)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(brass, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(brass, be good conductor of electricity)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(brass, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(brass, be best conductor of electricity)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Typical(brass, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(brass, is good heat conductor)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.60

Typical(brass, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(brass, be used in heat conductions)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.40

Salient(brass, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Salient(brass, be best conductor of electricity)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(brass, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(brass, be used in heat conductions)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(brass, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(brass, be best conductor of electricity)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.60

Typical(brass, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(brass, be good conductor of electricity)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.40

Salient(brass, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Salient(brass, be used in heat conductions)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.60

Typical(brass, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(brass, be best conductor of electricity)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(brass, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(brass, be used in heat conductions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

Salient(brass, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(brass, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(brass, be good conductor of heat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(brass, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(brass, be good conductor of heat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(brass, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(metal, be good conductor of electricity)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(brass, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(metal, be good conductor of heat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(brass, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(aluminum foil, be good conductor of heat)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(brass, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(aluminum foil, be good conductor of electricity)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(brass, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is good conductor)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.60

Typical(brass, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(metal, be good conductor of electricity)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Typical(brass, be good conductor of heat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(metal, be good conductor of heat)