brass: is good heat conductor

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents alloy
Weight: 0.63
, metal
Weight: 0.60
, finish
Weight: 0.59
, material
Weight: 0.58
Siblings french horn
Weight: 0.60
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.33
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.32
, titanium
Weight: 0.32
, steel
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good heat conductor 1.00
be good conductor of heat 1.00
is good conductor 0.92
be good conductor of electricity 0.90
be best conductor of electricity 0.88
be used in heat conductions 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(metal, be good conductor of heat)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(brass, is good heat conductor)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(metal, be good conductor of electricity)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(brass, is good heat conductor)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(brass, is good heat conductor)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(metal, be good conductor of electricity)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(brass, is good heat conductor)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(metal, be good conductor of heat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(brass, is good heat conductor)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(metal, be good conductor of heat)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(brass, is good heat conductor)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(metal, be good conductor of electricity)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(brass, is good heat conductor)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, be good conductor of heat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(brass, is good heat conductor)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, be good conductor of electricity)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(brass, is good heat conductor)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good conductor)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(metal, be good conductor of heat)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(brass, is good heat conductor)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(brass, is good heat conductor)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(metal, be good conductor of electricity)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(brass, is good heat conductor)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(brass, is good heat conductor)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(brass, is good heat conductor)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(aluminum foil, be good conductor of heat)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, be good conductor of heat)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(brass, is good heat conductor)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(aluminum foil, be good conductor of electricity)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, be good conductor of electricity)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(brass, is good heat conductor)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is good conductor)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is good conductor)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(brass, is good heat conductor)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(brass, is good heat conductor)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(brass, is good heat conductor)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(brass, be good conductor of electricity)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(brass, is good heat conductor)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(brass, be good conductor of electricity)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(brass, is good heat conductor)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(brass, be good conductor of electricity)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(brass, is good heat conductor)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(brass, be best conductor of electricity)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(brass, is good heat conductor)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(brass, be used in heat conductions)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(brass, is good heat conductor)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(brass, be best conductor of electricity)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(brass, is good heat conductor)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(brass, be good conductor of heat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(brass, is good heat conductor)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(brass, be used in heat conductions)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(brass, is good heat conductor)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(brass, be good conductor of heat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(brass, is good heat conductor)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(brass, be good conductor of heat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(brass, is good heat conductor)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(brass, be good conductor of electricity)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(brass, is good heat conductor)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(brass, be good conductor of heat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(brass, is good heat conductor)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(brass, be best conductor of electricity)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(brass, is good heat conductor)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(brass, be used in heat conductions)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(brass, is good heat conductor)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(brass, be best conductor of electricity)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(brass, is good heat conductor)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(brass, be used in heat conductions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(brass, is good heat conductor)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(brass, is good heat conductor)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(brass, is good heat conductor)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(brass, is good heat conductor)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(brass, is good heat conductor)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(brass, is good heat conductor)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(metal, be good conductor of heat)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(brass, is good heat conductor)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(metal, be good conductor of electricity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(brass, is good heat conductor)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, be good conductor of heat)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(brass, is good heat conductor)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, be good conductor of electricity)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(brass, is good heat conductor)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is good conductor)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(brass, is good heat conductor)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(metal, be good conductor of electricity)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(brass, is good heat conductor)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(metal, be good conductor of heat)