bread: be at breadmaker

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents staple
Weight: 0.69
, fresh food
Weight: 0.66
, diet
Weight: 0.64
, food
Weight: 0.62
Siblings tortilla
Weight: 0.69
, pancake
Weight: 0.65
, english muffin
Weight: 0.62
, waffle
Weight: 0.56
, scone
Weight: 0.49

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at breadmaker 1.00
be buy in bakery 0.76
be at bread store 0.75
be at pastry shop 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(bread, be at breadmaker) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(scone, be buy in bakery)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(bread, be at breadmaker) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(scone, be buy in bakery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(scone, be buy in bakery)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(bread, be at breadmaker) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(bread, be at breadmaker)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(bread, be at breadmaker) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(bread, be at bread store)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(bread, be at breadmaker) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(bread, be at pastry shop)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(bread, be at breadmaker) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(bread, be at pastry shop)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(bread, be at breadmaker) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(bread, be at pastry shop)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(bread, be at breadmaker) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(bread, be at bread store)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(bread, be at breadmaker) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(bread, be at pastry shop)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(bread, be at breadmaker) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(bread, be at bread store)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(bread, be at breadmaker) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bread, be at bread store)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(bread, be at breadmaker) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(bread, be at breadmaker) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(bread, be at breadmaker)

Typical implies Plausible

0.01
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(bread, be at breadmaker) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(bread, be at breadmaker)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(bread, be at breadmaker) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(scone, be buy in bakery)