bread: be better for toast

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents staple
Weight: 0.69
, fresh food
Weight: 0.66
, diet
Weight: 0.64
, food
Weight: 0.62
Siblings tortilla
Weight: 0.69
, pancake
Weight: 0.65
, pita
Weight: 0.64
, brioche
Weight: 0.63
, english muffin
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better for toast 1.00
toast 0.95
become toast 0.93
be better for french toast 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(bread, be better for toast)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(bread, be better for toast)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(bread, be better for toast)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(bread, toast)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(bread, be better for toast)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(bread, become toast)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(bread, be better for toast)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(bread, toast)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(bread, be better for toast)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(bread, become toast)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(bread, be better for toast)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(bread, toast)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(bread, be better for toast)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(bread, be better for french toast)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(bread, be better for toast)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(bread, be better for french toast)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(bread, be better for toast)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(bread, be better for french toast)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(bread, be better for toast)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(bread, become toast)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(bread, be better for toast)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bread, become toast)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(bread, be better for toast)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(bread, toast)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(bread, be better for toast)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(bread, be better for french toast)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(bread, be better for toast)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(bread, be better for toast)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(bread, be better for toast)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(bread, be better for toast)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(bread, be better for toast)