bread: be nice to eat

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents staple
Weight: 0.69
, fresh food
Weight: 0.66
, diet
Weight: 0.64
, food
Weight: 0.62
Siblings tortilla
Weight: 0.69
, pancake
Weight: 0.65
, english muffin
Weight: 0.62
, waffle
Weight: 0.56
, scone
Weight: 0.49

Related properties

Property Similarity
be nice to eat 1.00
be eat 0.86
wants to eat 0.85
be defined as something you can cook and eat 0.83
be good for you 0.82
be good 0.81
be eat by person 0.80
be eat mostly at breakfast 0.80
be eat from dish 0.79
be yummy 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(food, wants to eat)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(bread, be nice to eat)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(fresh food, be good)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(bread, be nice to eat)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(food, be good)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(bread, be nice to eat)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(food, be yummy)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(bread, be nice to eat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(bread, be nice to eat)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(food, be yummy)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(bread, be nice to eat)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(food, be good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(bread, be nice to eat)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(fresh food, be good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(bread, be nice to eat)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(food, wants to eat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bread, be nice to eat)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(food, be yummy)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bread, be nice to eat)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(food, be good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bread, be nice to eat)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, be good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bread, be nice to eat)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, wants to eat)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bread, be nice to eat)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(waffle, be eat mostly at breakfast)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bread, be nice to eat)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(waffle, be good for you)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(food, wants to eat)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(bread, be nice to eat)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(bread, be nice to eat)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(fresh food, be good)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(bread, be nice to eat)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(bread, be nice to eat)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(food, be good)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(bread, be nice to eat)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(bread, be nice to eat)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(food, be yummy)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(bread, be nice to eat)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(bread, be nice to eat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(bread, be nice to eat)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(waffle, be good for you)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(waffle, be good for you)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(bread, be nice to eat)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(waffle, be eat mostly at breakfast)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(waffle, be eat mostly at breakfast)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(bread, be nice to eat)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(bread, be nice to eat)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(bread, be nice to eat)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(bread, be eat)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(bread, be nice to eat)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(bread, be eat)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(bread, be nice to eat)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(bread, be eat)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(bread, be nice to eat)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(bread, be eat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(bread, be nice to eat)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(bread, be nice to eat)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bread, be nice to eat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(bread, be nice to eat)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(bread, be nice to eat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bread, be nice to eat)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(food, wants to eat)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bread, be nice to eat)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(fresh food, be good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bread, be nice to eat)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(food, be good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bread, be nice to eat)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(food, be yummy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bread, be nice to eat)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(waffle, be good for you)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bread, be nice to eat)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(waffle, be eat mostly at breakfast)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(bread, be nice to eat)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(food, wants to eat)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(bread, be nice to eat)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(fresh food, be good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(bread, be nice to eat)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(food, be good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(bread, be nice to eat)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(food, be yummy)