breaking: be considered good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents damage
Weight: 0.59
, crime
Weight: 0.57
, charge
Weight: 0.56
, matter
Weight: 0.52
, problem
Weight: 0.51
Siblings stealing
Weight: 0.31
, cracking
Weight: 0.31
, hacking
Weight: 0.31
, tear
Weight: 0.31
, breach
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered good 1.00
be considered unlucky 0.78
is great 0.77
is good show 0.77
is even important 0.77
has quality good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(breaking, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(stealing, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(breaking, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cracking, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(breaking, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hacking, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(breaking, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(stealing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(stealing, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(breaking, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(cracking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(cracking, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(breaking, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(hacking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(hacking, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(breaking, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(breaking, be considered good)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(breaking, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(breaking, is even important)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(breaking, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(breaking, be considered unlucky)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(breaking, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(breaking, is even important)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(breaking, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(breaking, is great)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(breaking, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(breaking, is good show)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(breaking, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(breaking, is even important)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(breaking, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(breaking, be considered unlucky)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(breaking, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(breaking, be considered unlucky)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(breaking, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(breaking, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(breaking, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(breaking, is good show)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(breaking, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(breaking, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(breaking, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(breaking, is great)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(breaking, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(breaking, is good show)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(breaking, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(breaking, is great)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(breaking, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(breaking, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(breaking, be considered unlucky)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(breaking, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(breaking, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(breaking, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(breaking, is good show)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(breaking, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(breaking, is great)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(breaking, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(breaking, is even important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(breaking, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(breaking, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(breaking, be considered good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(breaking, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(breaking, be considered good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(breaking, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(stealing, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(breaking, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cracking, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(breaking, be considered good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(hacking, has quality good)