breaking: be in hard back

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents damage
Weight: 0.59
, crime
Weight: 0.57
, charge
Weight: 0.56
, matter
Weight: 0.52
, problem
Weight: 0.51
Siblings stealing
Weight: 0.31
, cracking
Weight: 0.31
, hacking
Weight: 0.31
, tear
Weight: 0.31
, breach
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in hard back 1.00
be in back 0.91
is hard 0.90
be from n hard 0.78
come out year 0.78
come out next year 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(matter, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(breaking, be in hard back)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(crime, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(breaking, be in hard back)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(breaking, be in hard back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(crime, is hard)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(breaking, be in hard back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(matter, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(breaking, be in hard back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(matter, is hard)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(breaking, be in hard back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(crime, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(breaking, be in hard back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hacking, is hard)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(matter, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(breaking, be in hard back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(breaking, be in hard back)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(crime, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(breaking, be in hard back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(breaking, be in hard back)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(breaking, be in hard back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(hacking, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(hacking, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(breaking, be in hard back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(breaking, be in hard back)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(breaking, be in hard back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(breaking, be in back)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(breaking, be in hard back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(breaking, be in back)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(breaking, be in hard back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(breaking, be in back)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(breaking, be in hard back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(breaking, is hard)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(breaking, be in hard back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(breaking, be from n hard)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(breaking, be in hard back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(breaking, come out year)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(breaking, be in hard back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(breaking, come out next year)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(breaking, be in hard back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(breaking, is hard)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(breaking, be in hard back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(breaking, come out year)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(breaking, be in hard back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(breaking, come out next year)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(breaking, be in hard back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(breaking, come out year)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(breaking, be in hard back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(breaking, come out next year)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(breaking, be in hard back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(breaking, be from n hard)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(breaking, be in hard back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(breaking, be in back)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(breaking, be in hard back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(breaking, be from n hard)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(breaking, be in hard back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(breaking, come out year)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(breaking, be in hard back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(breaking, come out next year)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(breaking, be in hard back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(breaking, is hard)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(breaking, be in hard back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(breaking, is hard)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(breaking, be in hard back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(breaking, be from n hard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(breaking, be in hard back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(breaking, be in hard back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(breaking, be in hard back)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(breaking, be in hard back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(breaking, be in hard back)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(breaking, be in hard back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(crime, is hard)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(breaking, be in hard back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(matter, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(breaking, be in hard back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hacking, is hard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(breaking, be in hard back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(crime, is hard)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(breaking, be in hard back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(matter, is hard)