breaking: has quality news

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents damage
Weight: 0.59
, crime
Weight: 0.57
, charge
Weight: 0.56
, matter
Weight: 0.52
, problem
Weight: 0.51
Siblings stealing
Weight: 0.31
, cracking
Weight: 0.31
, hacking
Weight: 0.31
, tear
Weight: 0.31
, breach
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality news 1.00
has quality bad 0.80
has quality good 0.79
has quality change 0.76
has quality better 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(breaking, has quality news)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(crime, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(stealing, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(stealing, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(cracking, has quality change)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hacking, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cracking, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cracking, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hacking, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(breach, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(breaking, has quality news)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(stealing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(stealing, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(stealing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(stealing, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(breach, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(breach, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(cracking, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(cracking, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(cracking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(cracking, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(hacking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(hacking, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(hacking, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(hacking, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(cracking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(cracking, has quality change)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(breaking, has quality news)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality better)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality change)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(breaking, has quality change)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(breaking, has quality change)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(breaking, has quality change)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(breaking, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(breaking, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(breaking, has quality better)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(breaking, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(breaking, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(breaking, has quality better)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(breaking, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(breaking, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(breaking, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality news)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(breaking, has quality news)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(stealing, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(stealing, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(cracking, has quality change)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(cracking, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(hacking, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(breach, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cracking, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(hacking, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(breaking, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)