breeding: be different from engineering

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents breed
Weight: 0.60
, activity
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings thoroughbred
Weight: 0.34
, hunting
Weight: 0.33
, feeding
Weight: 0.33
, harvesting
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different from engineering 1.00
differ from engineering 0.91
differ from gentic engineering 0.91
be different from genetic engineering 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(breeding, be different from engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(breeding, be different from engineering)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(breeding, be different from engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(breeding, differ from engineering)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(breeding, be different from engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(breeding, differ from gentic engineering)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(breeding, be different from engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(breeding, differ from gentic engineering)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(breeding, be different from engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(breeding, differ from gentic engineering)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(breeding, be different from engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(breeding, differ from engineering)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(breeding, be different from engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(breeding, differ from engineering)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(breeding, be different from engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(breeding, differ from engineering)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(breeding, be different from engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(breeding, differ from gentic engineering)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(breeding, be different from engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(breeding, be different from genetic engineering)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(breeding, be different from engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(breeding, be different from genetic engineering)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(breeding, be different from engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(breeding, be different from genetic engineering)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(breeding, be different from engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(breeding, be different from genetic engineering)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(breeding, be different from engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(breeding, be different from engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(breeding, be different from engineering)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(breeding, be different from engineering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(breeding, be different from engineering)