breeding: be in zoos bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents breed
Weight: 0.60
, activity
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings thoroughbred
Weight: 0.34
, hunting
Weight: 0.33
, feeding
Weight: 0.33
, harvesting
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in zoos bad 1.00
be in zoos 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(breeding, be in zoos bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(breeding, be in zoos bad)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(breeding, be in zoos bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(breeding, be in zoos)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(breeding, be in zoos bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(breeding, be in zoos)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(breeding, be in zoos bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(breeding, be in zoos)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(breeding, be in zoos bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(breeding, be in zoos)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(breeding, be in zoos bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(breeding, be in zoos bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(breeding, be in zoos bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(breeding, be in zoos bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(breeding, be in zoos bad)