bribery: is ethically wrong

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.60
, charge
Weight: 0.60
, crime
Weight: 0.58
, practice
Weight: 0.57
, felony
Weight: 0.57
Siblings corruption
Weight: 0.35
, fraud
Weight: 0.34
, perjury
Weight: 0.33
, money laundering
Weight: 0.33
, conspiracy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is ethically wrong 1.00
is unethical 0.80
has quality wrong 0.79
is morally worrisome 0.78
is immoral 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(bribery, is ethically wrong)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(money laundering, is unethical)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(bribery, is ethically wrong)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(corruption, is unethical)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(bribery, is ethically wrong)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(corruption, is immoral)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(bribery, is ethically wrong)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(corruption, is unethical)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(corruption, is unethical)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(bribery, is ethically wrong)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(money laundering, is unethical)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(money laundering, is unethical)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(bribery, is ethically wrong)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(corruption, is immoral)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(corruption, is immoral)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(bribery, is ethically wrong)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(bribery, is ethically wrong)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(bribery, is ethically wrong)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(bribery, is unethical)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(bribery, is ethically wrong)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(bribery, is unethical)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(bribery, is ethically wrong)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(bribery, is unethical)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(bribery, is ethically wrong)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(bribery, has quality wrong)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(bribery, is ethically wrong)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(bribery, has quality wrong)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(bribery, is ethically wrong)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(bribery, is morally worrisome)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(bribery, is ethically wrong)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(bribery, is unethical)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(bribery, is ethically wrong)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(bribery, has quality wrong)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(bribery, is ethically wrong)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(bribery, has quality wrong)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(bribery, is ethically wrong)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(bribery, is morally worrisome)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(bribery, is ethically wrong)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(bribery, is morally worrisome)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(bribery, is ethically wrong)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(bribery, is morally worrisome)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(bribery, is ethically wrong)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(bribery, is ethically wrong)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(bribery, is ethically wrong)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(bribery, is ethically wrong)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(bribery, is ethically wrong)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(bribery, is ethically wrong)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(corruption, is unethical)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(bribery, is ethically wrong)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(money laundering, is unethical)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(bribery, is ethically wrong)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(corruption, is immoral)