bridge: be big

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents barrier
Weight: 0.67
, project
Weight: 0.66
, landmark
Weight: 0.65
, park
Weight: 0.63
Siblings river
Weight: 0.67
, golden gate bridge
Weight: 0.64
, highway
Weight: 0.62
, route
Weight: 0.59
, tunnel
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be big 1.00
be at big city 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bridge, be big)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(highway, be at big city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(bridge, be big)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(highway, be at big city)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(highway, be at big city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(bridge, be big)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(bridge, be big)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(bridge, be big)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(bridge, be big)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bridge, be big)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(bridge, be big)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(bridge, be big)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bridge, be big)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(highway, be at big city)