brigade: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents unit
Weight: 0.64
, service
Weight: 0.46
, division
Weight: 0.46
, regiment
Weight: 0.45
Siblings battalion
Weight: 0.38
, cavalry
Weight: 0.34
, central processing unit
Weight: 0.34
, platoon
Weight: 0.33
, squadron
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is quality 0.91
has quality system 0.84
is good now 0.83
has quality standard 0.83
be bad in bulgaria 0.77
has quality definition 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(brigade, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(division, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(brigade, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(brigade, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(division, is good now)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(brigade, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(unit, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(brigade, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(service, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(division, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(service, is quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(unit, has quality standard)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(division, is good now)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(division, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(division, is good now)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(unit, has quality standard)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(service, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(platoon, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(brigade, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(division, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(brigade, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(brigade, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(division, is good now)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(brigade, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(unit, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(brigade, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(platoon, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(platoon, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(brigade, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(brigade, has quality system)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(brigade, has quality system)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(brigade, has quality system)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(brigade, has quality system)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(brigade, has quality definition)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(brigade, has quality definition)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(brigade, has quality definition)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(brigade, has quality definition)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(brigade, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(brigade, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(unit, has quality standard)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(division, is good now)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(division, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(platoon, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(division, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(unit, has quality standard)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(brigade, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(division, is good now)